In the article, “What Is an Author,” Michel Foucault
explains his complex ideas on what it means to be an author. Without wanting to
give a precise definition of an author, Foucault focus more on the how an
author exists and relationship between an author and a text. Foucault explains
that today’s writing is not meant to pin a subject within language, but is a
question of creating a space into which the writing subject constantly
disappears. He argues that all authors
are writers, but not all writers are authors. Foucault explains in his “author
function” that an author exists only as a function of a written work.
Furthermore, he explains what exactly it means to work in terms of authoring. A
key analytical question that comes to mind when evaluating this article is; how
exactly does an author exist? After
reading this article I came to the conclusion that there are several questions
that must be answered in order to determine whether an author exists. These
questions include, “Could what the
“author” wrote be classified as work?” and “Does the author have a functioning name?” In
order for an author to exist, there must be a creation of a piece of work
similar to a sacrifice. The author must become “dead” for the work to become
alive. In order for a writer to become an author, we must be able to study the
piece through analyzing the work’s form and content. Foucault uses techniques
in his writing such as metaphors and descriptions. He compares writing to a
game that goes beyond its own rules and transgresses its limits. Using this
metaphor helped to understand that the main point of writing is not to manifest
or exalt the act of writing. Overall, Foucault did a good job in explaining the
complex answer to the simple question of, ”What is an author?”
Pages
Mission Statement
As Clemson composition students, we strive to uphold the values of Clemson University, maintain a high quality standard of writing, and successfully implement rhetorical strategies in our work.
You have a good key analytical question that really raises a great point about what an author actually is.
ReplyDelete